翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Charta 77 (band) ・ Charta emporetica ・ Charta Oecumenica ・ Charta tree frog ・ Chartainvilliers ・ Chartak ・ Chartak District ・ Chartalism ・ Chartaprops v Silberman ・ Chartaque ・ Chartar ・ ChartAttack ・ Chartbeat ・ Chartboost ・ Chartbreak ・ Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd ・ Chartbusters Go Pop ・ Chartchai Chionoi ・ Chartchai Juntrat ・ Chartchai Ngamsan ・ Charte d'Alaon ・ Charter ・ Charter (disambiguation) ・ Charter 08 ・ Charter 77 ・ Charter 97 ・ Charter Academy ・ Charter Act of 1793 ・ Charter Act of 1813 ・ Charter Air Transport Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd ''Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd'' () (UKHL 38 ) is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. It creates a so-called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. It also, importantly, reaffirmed the rule of English law, that pre-contractual negotiations were ordinarily inadmissible when construing a contract. ==Facts== Persimmon agreed to get planning permission, build some residences on Chartbrook’s land at 1 to 9 Hardwicks Way, Wandsworth, and then sell the properties. Chartbrook would pay for it, subject to an ‘Additional Residential Payment’ defined as ‘23.4% of the price achieved for each Residential Unit in excess of the Minimum Guaranteed Residential Unit Value less the Costs and Incentives.’ This would be paid by Persimmon to Chartbrook. Chartbrook calculated this to mean £4,484,862 but Persimmon said on a proper construction the amount was £897,051. Persimmon argued that even if they were wrong on construction of the document, rectification should be granted, and if not their pre-contractual negotiations should be taken into account. Chartbrook argued the precontractual negotiations were inadmissible. The High Court and Court of Appeal agreed with Chartbrook's interpretation. Persimmon Ltd appealed on the interpretation given and argued that if they failed on those grounds, the contract should be construed in light of previous negotiations, or that the court should allow for the document to be rectified, because it was clear that the intentions of the parties was different from that found. Accordingly it contended that the rule in ''Prenn v Simmonds''〔() 1 WLR 1381〕 that pre contractual negotiations should be ignored, was an illogical rule and should be overturned. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.